Based on my background in biology and animal behaviour, based my own observation about sexual and social behaviour within our species and based on studies that have been made about homosexuality, I hypothesise that no one is gay or straight – hetero- and homosexuality is purely a result of suggestions and social construct.
This hypothesis came up from a discussion that I had with my wife. She seemed to have spent the morning reading about the science behind homosexuality, and in what way evolution would allow there to be homosexuality present in the population.
Many studies suggest that there is a so called “gay gene”, some studies suggest that homosexuality can be a result of environmental factors in the womb or external that allow genes to be expressed differently – as explained by Dawkins in the video.
I argue that our obsession about homosexuality makes us focus on the wrong issue. In fact, our obsession with gender also misdirects our studies and focus. What is sexual attraction is purely biological. It has to do with so called pheromones as to find the mate that perfectly matches our genetic composition to produce strong offsprings.
If that is true, why would genitalia matter? That is where the social pressure and power of suggestion comes in. I don’t believe being heterosexual is the “normal”, and other sexualities are derivatives. My theory is that we are all bisexual – or rather, pansexual. Those that identify as gay or straight are that way because of years of social pressure and suggestions.
Before you skip the rest of this article and hit the comment button and share unpleasant angry comments, I will say that I respect whatever LGBTQ+ identity you identify with. It is none of my business to say what is true or not. It is important that we respect everyone for who they are and not question whatever identity they identify with.
I am simply exploring the evolutionary perspective of sexuality in the biological sense. Psychology certainly plays a big part of it. We do not fall in love or become sexually aroused with our eyes, it is our nose that activates that part of our brain when a certain person is genetically compatible to us – we then explain it with our eyes. For those who identify as bisexuals or pansexuals will understand this. For those who identify as heterosexual and homosexual will not.
If we were all open about our sexuality and explore our feelings, it would possibly be clear that we are all bisexuals. Many times I have heard monosexuals say that they found a person attractive but would never date them because they are personally gay or straight. As humans we tend to close doors to possibilities when we feel these doors should not be open.
“What makes people homosexual?” is the wrong question to ask. You should ask “What makes people monosexual?” – THAT would be more interesting. The first question assumes that heterosexuality is the norm, while bisexuality could very well be the norm. Our research in homosexuality is very 80’s minded. I cannot understand why there is so much research in the “gay gene” when it is obvious that sexuality seems to be a spectrum and we all fall in different parts of the spectrum.
I would love to test this hypothesis.